(November 2022)
In the 1980s, the U.S.
Government began addressing a large environmental threat: leaks from
underground storage tanks contaminating drinking water. The tanks at both active
and abandoned gas station/convenience store operations located throughout the
country were the primary sources of such leaking. Most of the tanks were metal
and, as they aged, were prone to leaks and no provisions
to monitor or periodically test them existed.
Many service stations
that, for various reasons, had gone out of business, resulted in numerous
vacant and/or abandoned properties. The underground gasoline storage tanks at
these locations had to be removed or sealed and previous leakage damage cleaned
up before they could be used for other purposes. All too often, the owners were
unknown, could not be located, or were unable or unwilling to pay the cleanup
costs.
A massive effort was needed to identify those tanks, test them, retrofit
or abandon them, and clean up the damage to underground sources of drinking
water. Because the environmental and economic problems existed in all 50
states, the action needed to address and resolve the problem had to take place
at the federal level. That action occurred in 1984 with the enaction of the
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendment to the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA).
The RCRA empowered the
federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate storage of hazardous
materials in all 50 states to protect human health and the environment. The
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendment was directed primarily at the serious
problem of leaking underground petroleum storage tanks. The regulations further
allowed a state to create an agency to oversee implementation of the various
Acts and their amendments, subject to EPA approval.
The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendment is Subchapter One of the RCRA
consisting of eight categories of regulations. Owners or operators of
underground storage tanks were required to:
This Act originally allowed a limited number of options and a few state
trust funds were added later. Tank owners or operators must do one of the
following:
The guarantor or
self-insurer must have at least $10,000,000 in net worth. The insurance
industry was slow to respond to this need at first. A few states established
State Funds and/or allowed groups such as the Petroleum Marketers to set up
captives or risk retention groups and these entities filled much of the void.
This article addresses only the insurance alternative. Most states have phased
out their underground storage tank-related funds since 1998 and have
transferred the burden to the private sector. However, captives are still major
competitors for private insurance.
The Insurance Services
Office (ISO) developed the first version of the Underground Storage Tank Policy–Designated
Tanks in 1991. It worked closely with the EPA to be certain that it met EPA
financial responsibility requirements. Much of the policy language came
directly from the applicable EPA regulations. In turn, the EPA thoroughly reviewed
the policy and determined that it complied with all government and EPA
regulations. Its release was temporarily suspended
when it appeared that the government would delay the effective date and perhaps
change some of the regulatory conditions. ISO finalized and released the policy
when the EPA finally clarified and announced the dates, regulations, and
conditions of compliance.
When the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendment to the RCRA was announced in 1984, it was estimated that
5,000,000 underground tanks containing petroleum products were scattered across
the country. The overwhelming task of simply identifying the tank locations
began. Corrective action costs due to the need to retrofit, replace, or seal
existing tanks and to clean up the ground around the ones that had leaked petroleum
products were overwhelming. The RCRA was amended again in 1986 to create the
Leaking UST Trust Fund (LUST). Its purpose was to pay corrective action costs
in cases where the owner and/or operator was unknown, could not be located, was
unable or was unwilling to pay the cleanup costs.
Congress enacted the
legislation known as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (also known as Superfund) in 1980. While “Superfund” operates
independently from the RCRA, it influences the regulations EPA publishes in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (40 CFR 280 UST). CFR is the publication
established for federal agencies to use to distribute up-to-date regulations
developed in response to federal legislation.
An underground storage tank is any tank that has
10% or more of its volume below ground or grade level. This includes any
machinery, equipment, or piping below ground used with the tank. For this
reason, even a tank completely above the surface that has considerable
underground pipes and equipment may qualify as an underground storage tank. The
term may be a bit misleading because it includes these types of tanks in
addition to those completely below the surface of the ground. In any event,
they are all subject to rules for financial responsibility compliance.
The RCRA does not apply
to hazardous waste incidents subject to other legislation. It includes a
detailed list of specific tanks that RCRA and subsequent legislation and
regulation do not apply to. This includes:
Related Article:
Underground Storage Tank Policy–Designated Tanks Eligibility
Every owner or operator
of underground storage tanks that contain petroleum products is required to prove
financial responsibility in connection with them. The only exemptions to the
regulations are the small tanks that serve farms and homes. The regulations
even include government entities, Indian tribes, and small owners/operators
that own or operate even one small tank and they are not exempt. This results
in a great need for an insurance product that complies with the regulations.
The legislation applies
to property owners and operators that have retail or wholesale sales or distribution
of gasoline, fuel oil, or other petroleum products. It also applies to many
other operations that have underground petroleum storage tanks.
The program appears to be effective. According to
the EPA Office of Underground Storage Tanks (OUST), almost 1,800,000 old and
unsafe tanks have been either updated or closed and sealed. In addition, more
than 457,000 petroleum leak sites have been cleaned up. Underground water
sources are safer and many sites that used to have underground storage tanks have
been cleaned up and are now being used for other commercial purposes. Beginning
in 2015, the EPA has implemented additional regulations. It has also called for
additional inspections of existing tanks and the installation of back-up
systems to contain possible leaks.
1998 was a benchmark year in the history of
underground storage tanks and the regulations that apply to them. EPA
regulations required that any tank still being used for petroleum products
storage at that time had to be equipped with spill protection, overfill
protection, and corrosion protection. As a result, many tanks that did not
conform to these requirements were closed and sealed that year.
Besides all states having established implementing
agencies, many also either established state run trust funds to charge premiums
and cover corrective action costs, or approved using Certificates of Deposit,
Captive Mutual Insurance Companies, Risk Retention Groups, and similar
financial instruments or entities. Many state funds have been phased out. For
example, Iowa set up a state insurance program in 1989 but established
procedures to transfer its funds and responsibilities to a captive established
by the Petroleum Marketers Association in 1998. West Virginia, Arizona, Texas,
and other states also established state owned and operated insurance trusts.
Newer and properly manufactured and installed
underground storage tanks should not leak. The required ongoing testing and
monitoring should eliminate the serious consequences of petroleum leaching into
surrounding ground and water over long periods of time. As a result of these
initiatives, the insurance needed to prove financial responsibility is now much
more affordable and easier to obtain than in the past. While alternative ways to
provide financial responsibility are still valid and available, most owners and
operators choose a trust, a captive insurance company, or coverage from a
standard specialty lines insurer. At the present time, applications can be
filled out and quotes obtained over the Internet often in a matter of minutes.
The Insurance
Marketplace, a publication of The Rough Notes Company, Inc., has names and
contact information for a number of markets that offer this coverage in the
section titled “Underground Storage Tank (UST) Pollution Liability.” In
addition, the EPA and many state agencies publish and update a list of markets
on their websites, including many of the best-known names that provide
specialty insurance coverages.